perm filename OLSEN.LE1[LET,JMC] blob
sn#059035 filedate 1973-10-04 generic text, type C, neo UTF8
COMMENT ā VALID 00002 PAGES
C REC PAGE DESCRIPTION
C00001 00001
C00002 00002 Dear Ken:
C00007 ENDMK
Cā;
Dear Ken:
This is a request for a donation from D.E.C. to Stanford
University. As you may know, Stanford is in the middle of a big
campaign to raise $300,000,000, part of which we hope will come from
our friends in industry. Besides that, the Computer Science
Department has decided that the next big thing it needs is a display
system that will allow all its faculty and graduate students access
to whatever computers are available to them on campus and throught
the ARPA net.
Enclosed is a technical document that explains how we hope
to achieve this goal and what it will cost. I worked on a similar
plan when I was at M.I.T. this fall, and Gordon Bell is familiar
with the concepts and the reasoning behind them being the least
expensive current way of getting a system of high quality displays.
Is it possible for D.E.C. to consider a donation of
$200,000 to Stanford aimed at achieving this goal? There is no part
of the government that can be asked for this sort of thing these
days. I would be glad to come and discuss it with you at your
convenience.
This request has the approval of the Stanford
administration.
Sincerely yours,
John McCarthy
Professor of Computer Science
P.S. Two pieces of news. First, as you probably know ARPA, after
much delay, decided not to support Foonly. I think this was a
mistake, because Foonly would have been a good computer and we need
the expanded capacity, and secondly because much would have been
learned about using computers to debug computers. Unfortunately,
the long delay on top of the other long delays reduced morale in the
group to the point where it was not reasonable to look for other
support for the project. We hope ARPA will buy us a KL-10 when it
becomes available, because we need the capacity, have a special
interest in the KL-10, and can't get significant speed improvement
from a KI-10, because our slow memory requires a cache for
efficiency.
The other piece of news is that the Committee on computer
needs for research and instruction has concluded that Stanford needs
a computer dedicated to general interactive computing. Some kind of
PDP-10 is the leading candidate from the Committee's point of view,
but it will be a long battle to convince the Stanford Center for
Information Processing that anything not provided by IBM really has
any reason to exist.
J. McCarthy